News ID : 4229
Publish Date : 08 December 2020 - 09:04
In a situation where launching the third pole is a way to break the monopoly and create a competitive environment, experts in this field believe that launching this pole is not a good step and removing the monopoly of this industry in a situation where the current capacity of the two automakers is not fully used. Except for the elimination of grammatical pricing is not achieved.
Khodrocar - Alireza Razm Hosseini, from the beginning of his activity in the Ministry of Industry, criticized the monopoly in the automotive industry and emphasized on creating a competitive environment and announced that he will take any solution to solve this problem, even if this solution is to liberalize car imports.

He made the remarks in a recent statement that he would put the defeat of the monopoly on the agenda by strengthening domestic private companies with the aim of creating healthy competition, which seems to be announced with the announcement of the 1400 budget bill and the cancellation of car imports. , The ways to remove the monopoly of Mr. Minister have also changed.

"The monopoly created in this industry was created by the orderly pricing of the Competition Council, while we can see the elimination of the monopoly from the automobile industry by creating a competitive environment between the two major automakers.” Saeed Madani, expert of auto industry told khodrocar reporter.

"The current pricing system applied by the Competition Council has led to the elimination of domestic and foreign competitors and domestic and foreign investors from the industry. They will not be willing to invest.” He added.

"In a situation where the problems of automakers as well as the obstacles in the way of commercial automakers are not solved, we will start a new pole of automobile manufacturing. In practice, not only will the problem not be solved, but a lot of investment will be made.” Madani said.

"Currently, this capacity is one million and 800 thousand vehicles per year, which can be increased to two million units with a few minor changes, and now in a situation where it is being produced with less than the actual capacity and is looking to launch We are the new hub of car manufacturing and importing the private sector does not seem to be wise.” He continued.

"If the same investor invests in a healthy economic environment in active private and public companies and privatizes them as well as controls them through the government, not only will the capital and liquidity needed by the automakers be provided, but also It can bring these companies equipped with infrastructure and sales and after-sales service network, and they have the power to design and even design the platform, bring it closer to the real production capacity and witness the production of new cars in these companies.” He mentioned.

"After this incident, if the companies become active, planning can be done with the aim of launching new companies and the third pole, otherwise launching this pole in the current situation, which requires billions of investments, will not cure the pain.” He said.

"At present, prices are set for the products of the two automakers. In practice, domestic and foreign investors and even importers in this price range where the car is produced in the country, do not produce a car because it is stated that these cars are included and pricing is grammatical.” He added.

"There is no monopoly when the competitive environment is completely open and the price of the car is set in the market, so the investor justifies the investment, so in practice we created a monopoly with the pricing system; a monopoly that does not benefit the automaker in practice.” He said.

"At present, carmakers sell their products at a loss and below the real price, and not only do they not make a profit, but they are also making a loss. On the other hand, the real customer has to buy the car at a higher price, so neither the customer nor the carmaker Takes." He said.

Name:
Email:
* Comment:
دی اس
میتسوبیشی